The END of Bitcoin in the United States? The Senate Takes Action!

The future of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in the United States could be threatened by a controversial regulatory decision. Influential senators have expressed deep concern over a new interpretation of laws by the Department of Justice. This interpretation risks criminalizing the development of non-custodial Bitcoin software, thereby threatening innovation in this flourishing field.

The DOJ’s Crusade Against Bitcoin Privacy

The dispute stems from the DOJ’s radical interpretation of money services business (MSB) laws. Indeed, the Department now considers developers of non-custodial Bitcoin wallets to be illegally operating unregistered MSBs. This stance challenges the core principles of decentralization and self-custody of cryptocurrencies. The Samourai Wallet case, where the DOJ arrested the founders for money laundering, perfectly illustrates this new directive.

For many Bitcoin advocates, this legal offensive constitutes a direct attack on the privacy and financial freedom promised by crypto. Some fear that the DOJ seeks to stifle innovation in this domain by criminalizing essential tools for respecting user privacy.

The Senate Uprising!

In the face of this threat, influential voices in the U.S. Senate have risen to firmly condemn the DOJ’s approach. In a scathing letter addressed to Attorney General Merrick Garland, Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden denounced the Department’s “unprecedented interpretation.”

According to them, this stance clearly contradicts the Treasury Department’s guidelines and the intent of Congress. By significantly broadening the definition of an MSB, the DOJ threatens to “criminalize Americans offering non-custodial Bitcoin services and software.”

For the senators, such a decision would have devastating consequences. It would stifle innovation in decentralized financial technologies and undermine public trust in the rule of law in the United States. A significant warning that could foreshadow a legal showdown between the government and the Bitcoin industry.

This controversy highlights the growing tensions between U.S. regulators and the thriving Bitcoin ecosystem. While consumer protection is a legitimate priority, an overly strict approach risks stifling innovation and pushing developers to relocate their activities.