Major Sanctions On Russia : Trump Fuels Economic Warfare

The fragile balance of the conflict in Ukraine has just experienced a new turning point. Donald Trump, the American president, mentioned the possibility of imposing massive banking sanctions and high tariffs against Russia. This statement comes as Moscow intensifies its strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure, and Washington’s position wavers between conditional support for Kiev and seeking a diplomatic solution. However, this firm stance is accompanied by contradictory decisions, raising questions about Trump’s true intentions regarding foreign policy.

A new escalation in the economic war

Trump’s announcement fits into a context of heightened tension between Russia and Ukraine. On Friday, the American president published a message on his social network Truth Social in which he declares: “I am strongly considering banking sanctions, sanctions, and tariffs on a large scale against Russia until a ceasefire and a definitive agreement on peace are concluded.” This position marks a turning point in his discourse, which until now had focused on reducing military support for Kiev.

This declaration follows a massive attack carried out by Russia against Ukrainian infrastructure, involving 194 drones and 58 missiles. Such a large-scale offensive particularly targets the country’s energy infrastructure, worsening an already critical humanitarian situation. In light of these events, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has renewed his call for an aerial and maritime truce and hopes for a firmer response from the international community.

Between diplomacy and economic pressure : a balancing act

Paradoxically, while threatening Moscow with severe economic sanctions, Donald Trump has decided to temporarily suspend military aid to Ukraine. This decision raises questions, particularly regarding the impact it could have on Ukraine’s defense capabilities at a time when Russian pressure is intensifying. This stance illustrates a double strategic discourse, alternating between the declared desire to end the conflict and a reduction in Kiev’s means of resistance.

Meanwhile, talks are scheduled in Saudi Arabia between American and Ukrainian delegations, aimed at exploring the contours of a peace agreement. Similar discussions had already been initiated with Russian representatives in the Saudi kingdom. Trump emphasized this diplomatic approach and directly calls on the belligerents to negotiate: “To Russia and Ukraine, come to the negotiating table now, before it is too late. Thank you!”.

If Trump’s strategy relies on economic pressure meant to compel Moscow to negotiate, the halt of military aid could weaken Ukraine and compromise its maneuvering margins. Will the Kremlin agree to yield under the threat of new customs and banking sanctions? Or does this hybrid approach, mixing firmness and ambiguities, risk strengthening Vladimir Putin‘s position in this protracted conflict? The coming weeks will be crucial to gauge the repercussions of this wavering American posture.